CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "sample result"
816 result(s) found
Found 816 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Indian Penal Code Case Due to Erroneous Rejection of Eye-Witness Testimony. Absence of Blood Stains at the Assault Site Held Not Fatal When the Victim Was Moved Immediately, and Medical Evidence Supported Ocular Account.
22 Feb 2005The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 2 December 1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, acquittin...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Demand, and Recovery of Body. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused under Sections 364A, 302, 120-B, 201 read with Section 34 IPC.
24 Apr 2020The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug, son of Dr. Mukesh Chandak, a dentist in Nagpur. On 1st September 2014, Yug w...
- 331
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by strangulation set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
27 Jan 2022The appellant, Nandakumar @ Chhotu Vasudev Samant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the murder of his wife Suchitra under Se...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in POCSO Case — Rape and Murder of Minor Not Proven as 'Rarest of Rare' Due to Lack of Intent and Circumstantial Evidence Gaps. The court held that the case did not satisfy the 'rarest of rare' test under Section 302 IPC, as there was no premeditation or intention to kill, and the accused was a young offender.
8 Feb 2022The case pertains to the tragic death of a minor child, Miss 'X', whose decomposed body was found on 4th April 2018 in thorny bushes used for defecati...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Pregnancy of Minor Rape Victim in Writ Petition Under Article 226. Gestational Age Exceeding 20 Weeks Permitted Termination Due to Risk to Minor's Mental and Physical Health Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
22 Mar 2021The petitioner, the mother of a minor girl aged about 17 years and 2 months, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Allegations of harassment and instigation under Sections 306, 354, 323, 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
7 Apr 2025The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.07.2017 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri (si...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Love Affair Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory coupled with motive and recovery of weapon established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.
28 Apr 2010The appellant, Satish Ramchandra Bavbande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of Neeta, a 16-year-old girl, under Sec...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.
1 Jul 2016The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...
- 146
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.
24 Oct 2016The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...
- 120
