Search Results for "review dismissed"

5416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Writ Petition Challenging Review Order in Land Acquisition Reference. Held that review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was maintainable as there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding non-consideration of earlier judgments.

The present writ petition was filed by the Administrator, Nashik, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Hoarding Site. The Court upheld the Collector's allotment of a hoarding site to Respondent No. 5 and the Minister's rejection of the Petitioner's review application, finding no illegality or violation of policy.

The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Town Planning Violation Case for Lack of Error Apparent. Review Petition Held Not Maintainable as It Sought Re-adjudication of Merits Already Decided in Writ Petition Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

The case concerns a review petition filed by R.Velu against an order dated 27.11.2024 in W.P. No. 1937 of 2024 passed by the Madras High Court. The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Review Applicant Attempted to Re-argue Merits, Which Is Impermissible Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The present review application was filed by A.Selva Sharma seeking to review the order dated 06.01.2022 passed by the Madras High Court in W.A.No.1656...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Enhanced Compensation Interest. Interpretation of Amended Provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Entitles Claimant to 15% Interest on Entire Award, Not Just Excess.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land belonging to the respondent-claimant under a notification published on 17 July 1980 under Section 4 of the Land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Appeal Due to Absence of Error Apparent on Record. Review Jurisdiction Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XLVII Not Invoked as Grounds Failed to Disclose Any Patent Error Justifying Interference with Earlier Dismissal of Special Leave Petition.

The dispute originated from a civil matter where the High Court allowed a second appeal, restoring the trial court's judgment. The petitioner, Vimla D...