Search Results for "receiver appointment"

573 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 573 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Recovery of Excise Duty from Sick Industrial Company Without BIFR Consent. The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA bars coercive recovery of dues without prior consent of BIFR, protecting the petitioner-company's assets.

The petitioner, Polymermann (ASIA) P. Ltd., is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of polymer chemicals, with its factory at MIDC, Ambad, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Striking Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-compliance with interim orders under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 leads to striking off defence under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 4 October 2012, which allowed a motion under Order 39 Rule 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Against Foreign Sovereign and Union of India for Want of Consent Under Section 86 CPC and Being Time-Barred. Suit Against Sovereign Head of Netherlands Dismissed as Plaint Did Not Disclose Cause of Action and Was Barred by Limitation.

The appellant, K.S. Dhondy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of US $25 million with interest against two respondents: Her Majesty th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Despite BIFR Proceedings. The court held that an order under Section 22 of SICA does not automatically bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Harshad Jayprasad Bakshi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. The court upheld the award granting balance machinery price and interest, rejecting claims of breach for non-procurement of insurance under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Neptune Marine Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 and a modified award dated 30 January 2012 under Sect...