Search Results for "project cancellation"

559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Flat Possession Case — Builders Failed to Prove Ownership of Land. Agreement to Sell and Power of Attorney Not Sufficient to Transfer Title Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, filed a suit for recovery of possession of 12 flats or in the alternative for recovery of possession of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Section 9 Interim Relief — Prima Facie Finding of Arbitration Agreement Sufficient. Court Rejects Argument That Existence of Arbitration Agreement Must Be Conclusively Determined at Interim Stage Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court on an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...