Search Results for "muddemal"

902 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 902 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chudaman s/o Gambhirdas Shahu, was convicted by the 6th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.553/2000 for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Eye Witness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing victim on abdomen confirmed as fatal injury was intentionally inflicted.

The appellant, Vijay Ramkrushna Gaikwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Utkarsha Barku Pawar. The incident...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Eye-Witnesses Were Inconsistent and Motive Not Proven.

The appellant, Akalesh Kumar @ Mithun Sharad Mishra, was convicted by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.417 of 1996 with Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Arising from Factional Clash. Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC Read With 149 IPC Confirmed Based on Corroborated Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The case arises from a factional clash between two groups in the Nalawade family in Velha, Pune. On the day of the incident, the deceased was attacked...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bride Burning Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were inconsistent and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Prakash Mahadeo Ghorpade, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his sister-in-law, Gangabai, by setting her on fire. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the prosecution failed to prove murderous intent beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Akram Khan Sirajulhaq, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Sitaram Natha More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Alka, by setting her on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Failure to Prove Unlawful Assembly. Conviction Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 323, 427, 452 Read With Section 149 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration and Witness Testimony Found Unreliable.

The case arises from a political rivalry in Aundi village, Solapur district. The appellants, along with others, were tried for forming an unlawful ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Motiram Marotrao Bhongade, Sanjay Motiram Bhongade, Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade, and Leelabai Falke, were convicted by the 3rd Adhoc Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Five Accused for Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Articles Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

The case pertains to a dacoity that occurred on 12 May 2003 at the office of Jasmine Cooperative Credit Society in Kalyan. The appellants, along with ...