Search Results for "insurance offence"

683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.24,93,000 for Leg Amputation. Negligence of ST Bus Driver Solely Responsible Despite Non-Joinder of Driver and Insurer; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Babubhai Jasabhai Maru (the claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim with Permanent Disability — Multiplier Corrected from 14 to 15 and Future Prospects Added Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant's Notional Income Reassessed at Rs. 6,500 per Month for Diamond Polisher Injured in 2002 Accident.

The appellant, Bhagwanbhai Dhanjibhai Kalsariya, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim Despite Fabricated Medical Bills in Motor Accident Case. The court held that fabrication of two medical bills does not disentitle the claimant to compensation for proved disability under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raman Bhagwandas Vanjani, filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, alleging that on 13/10/1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Injured Tractor Owner in Motor Accident Case. The court increased the award from Rs.64,000 to Rs.1,00,000 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the severity of injuries and medical expenses.

The appellant, Sanjay Sukhdeo Mankar, was the owner of a tractor bearing registration no. MH30E 7795. On 06/03/2001 at about 2:30 p.m., he was driving...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition for Want of Evidence. Claimant's Unrebutted Testimony and Medical Records Sufficient to Prove Accident and Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sunith Kumar V., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal: Confiscation Under Rule 40 Central Excise Rules Limited to Non-Duty Paid Tobacco; Fine Reduced Proportionately

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of a confiscation order under Rule 40 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, concerning a mixture of duty-paid an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Domestic Worker Trafficking Case — Upholds High Court's Rejection of Compounding and Discharge Orders. Court holds that Section 370 IPC trafficking offence is non-compoundable and that prima facie case exists against accused for wrongful confinement and trafficking.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed two appeals arising from a common FIR involving allegations of wrongful confinement and trafficking of a female d...