Search Results for "income share"

1587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Deemed Dividend Case Under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure by Company on Lessor's Property Not Deemed Dividend as It Was for Business Purpose and Not for Shareholder's Benefit.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 9th September 2011. The resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Held that the plaintiffs failed to prove joint family property and that the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Shareholder Deadlock Case. The core issue concerns whether a petitioner who is not the registered shareholder can maintain a winding up petition after the registered shareholder merged into it.

The dispute concerned the winding up of Capital Controls India Private Limited, a joint venture between Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...