Search Results for "impleading application"

528 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partner's Challenge to Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Without Joining Firm. Partnership Firm Not a Separate Legal Entity; Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually for Cheque Dishonour.

The case involves four criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioner, Philip J., challenging the order dated 23 July 2013 passed by the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Against Partner Without Joining Firm. Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually as Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act Extends to Every Person in Charge of Business.

The Bombay High Court decided four criminal writ petitions involving the same parties and a common question of law: whether a prosecution under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC's Reservation of Open Space for Staff Housing. Petitioner's claim for allotment of reserved open space fails as no legal right established and policy decisions of MIDC upheld.

The petitioner, a society of industrial members in MIDC Jalgaon area, filed a writ petition challenging communications dated July 3, 2002 and July 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Non-Joinder of Necessary Party in Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment Dispute. Members Cannot Challenge Cancellation of Bye-Law Amendment Without Impleading the Society Itself.

The petitioners, claiming to be members of a cooperative society named Buldhana Zilla Madhyamik Shikshak Sahakari Pat Sanstha Limited, Buldhana, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Financial Institution's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Enforcement of Mortgage Against Guarantors. The court held that the petition is maintainable against guarantors and not barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a financial institution, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Limited's Petition Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Loan Against Guarantors. Court holds that guarantors are jointly and severally liable for the debt of the principal borrower company.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a financial institution under the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a petition under Section 31(1)(aa) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Implementation. Court upholds eligibility determination and authorization of developer under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash proceedings leading to implementation of a Slum ...