Search Results for "composite consideration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "composite consideration"

967 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 967 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Prohibit Export of Sand Under MMDR Act - Gujarat Rules Restricting Inter-State Sand Movement Held Valid. The Court held that the prohibition on export of sand was a reasonable restriction under Article 304(b) of the Constitution, aimed at preventing illegal mining and conserving natural resources.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Gujarat against the Gujarat High Court's judgment striking down Rules that prohibited the export of ordinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal, Holds CESTAT Has Power to Condon Delay Under Section 129A(5) of Customs Act, 1962. The Court Remanded the Matter for Consideration of Condonation of Delay on Merits, Ruling That Appeals Under Section 129D(3) Are Deemed Appeals Under Section 129A and Thus Subject to the Same Condonation Power.

13 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Gen), Mumbai, filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

2 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.

6 Jul 2026

The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Orders Declaring Abatement and Rejecting Substitution in Second Appeal. Non-Substitution of Legal Heir of Co-Appellant Results in Whole Appeal Abating Where Decree is Joint and Indivisible, and Delay Condonation Denied as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Order XXII CPC and Limitation Act.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a civil suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and mesne profits regarding a house. The plaintiff claimed exclusive titl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Family Court’s Refusal to Appoint Commissioner for Partition of Matrimonial Property and Denial of Injunction Against Husband’s Entry. Issues Involve Interpretation of Joint Ownership and Rights Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

13 Apr 2018

The dispute arose from a marital discord between Sumit Vijay Kumar (husband) and Shraddha Gupta (wife), both working professionals married in 2011. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

28 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)