KAHC010531442022_1
23 Jan 2024The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a construction company against the Karnataka Slum Develo...
Search Results for "complex estate"
812 result(s) found
Found 812 result(s)
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014
30 Apr 2015The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Appeal Against BFAR Ruling on DDT Rate Under India-UK DTAA. Appellant Seeks Restriction of Dividend Distribution Tax to 10% Tax Treaty Rate on Dividends Paid to UK Parent Company.
28 Nov 2025The appellant, M/s. Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd., an Indian company and wholly owned subsidiary of Colorcon Limited, United Kingdom, filed an appeal under ...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.
31 Mar 2005The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Sets Aside Insurer's Liability in Workmen's Compensation Appeal Due to Lack of Proximate Connection Between Death and Use of Insured Vehicle. Death of Driver Caused by Unknown Jeep While Crossing Road Held Not to Arise Out of Use of Truck Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Insurer Not Liable.
28 Feb 2019The appeal arose from an order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Jalna, in W.C.A. No.9 of 2001, which held the United India Insurance Co...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.
3 Apr 2012The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...
- 19
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offences under Section 31-A violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
16 Jun 2011The matter involved two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31-A of the Narc...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.
10 Jun 2010This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Project Due to Unconscionable Delay. The Court upheld the termination of the development agreement under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, emphasizing that the right to shelter under Article 21 cannot be held hostage by a developer's inaction.
30 Jul 2024The present appeal arises from a dispute concerning a slum rehabilitation project in Borivali, Mumbai, under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, ...
- 300
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver Held Solely Negligent Despite Head-On Collision. Interest on Future Prospects Granted Following Supreme Court Precedent.
1 Oct 2024The appellant, IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 11.12.2012 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osman...
- 1830
