WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019
19 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "any further increase"
2798 result(s) found
Found 2798 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to ONGC Promotion Regulations and Supercession of Scheduled Caste Employee. The court examines whether the arbitrary change in promotion criteria without amending the Modified Recruitment and Promotion Regulations, 1980, violates the statutory scheme and results in unjust supercession of the SC employee.
22 Sep 2017The judgment arose from four writ petitions filed by employees of the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) challenging their supercession in...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition Filed by Noticee in FEMA Adjudication, Directs Returnable Rule on Issues of Cross-Examination and Joint Proceedings. The petition challenged the Special Director's refusal to permit cross-examination of witnesses and non-supply of co-noticees' replies in proceedings under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
30 Jan 2018Background: The petitioner, a former Vice President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Chairman of the Indian Premier League (IPL...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.
9 May 2014Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.
4 Apr 2024The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 — Dispute Over Price Variation Clause in Construction Contract Referred to Arbitrator. The court held that the dispute regarding the interpretation of Clause 13.6 of the contract is arbitrable and directed reference to arbitration.
14 Dec 2006The Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (plaintiff) filed an Arbitration Suit under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, seeking reference of disputes...
- 101
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.
25 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...
- 197
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Expungement of Irrelevant Portions from Affidavit of Examination-in-Chief in Testamentary Suit — Irrelevant and Prejudicial Statements Struck Out to Ensure Fair Trial. The court held that portions of an affidavit that are not relevant to the issues in the suit and are likely to prejudice the trial must be expunged under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
10 Jun 2014The applicant, Mrs. Mahabanoo Navroz Kotwal, filed a testamentary petition for probate of the alleged last Will and Testament of Nergish Keki Cassad, ...
- 139
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to detenu, violating Article 22(5) right to make effective representation.
31 Jul 2024The appellant, wife of detenu Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji, challenged the detention order dated 31.08.2023 passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA b...
- 3580
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrative Tribunal established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and the notification dated 2 August 2019 is valid.
21 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Orissa High Court judgment upholding the abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT). The ...
- 199
