Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

775 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 775 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Quashing State Circulars on Temple Land Records in M.P. Land Revenue Code Dispute. Executive Instructions Found Invalid as They Sought to Override Statutory Bhumiswami Rights of Pujaris Protected Under Sections 57 and 158 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

The dispute arose from circulars issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh in 1994 and 2008 directing deletion of Pujari names from revenue records to pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court upholds Scrutiny Committee's order based on Vigilance Cell report showing inconsistent caste entries in pre-1950 documents, and petitioner's failure to produce relevant documents despite opportunity.

The petitioner, Smt. Gomati Kishor Palliwar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21-03-2018 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Veri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...