Search Results for "Spot Panchnama"

1676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 395, 397 IPC. The Court Examines the Identification of Accused in a Dacoity Case Where No Test Identification Parade Was Conducted.

Background: This criminal appeal arose from a judgment of the IIIrd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 63 of 2004, convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Human Trafficking and POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Running Brothel and Exploiting Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Sunita @ Neha Machhindra Chandne and Sharda Machindra Chandne, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 370 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Dowry Death Case — Life Sentence Confirmed for Husband Who Set Wife Ablaze on Suspicion of Infidelity. Dying Declarations and Medical Evidence Found Credible and Consistent.

The appellant, Balu Dharma Shendge, was convicted by the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his wife Rekha under Section 302 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — Failure to Put CA Report Under Section 313 CrPC Not Fatal. Possession of 48 Bottles of Illicit Liquor Proved Through Recovery and Panch Witnesses, Conviction Under Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Confirmed.

The applicant, Sau. Shobha Baburo Shende, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagbhid, under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 149, 323 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal was filed by the State of Gujarat under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order ...