Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

1196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1196 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Entitlement to Enhanced Compensation for Trees on Acquired Land. The court held that the appellant, whose land was acquired for a highway project, was not entitled to separate compensation for trees as the land was already acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the award included compensation for the land and improvements.

24 Jul 2013

The appellant, Sri Sannarangappa, owned land bearing Sy.No. 54/2 in Agrahara Koratagere Taluk, Tumkur District, which he purchased on 1.1.1979. Trees ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2021

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

2 Sep 2024

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation to Rs. 1,500 per sq m. Following Division Bench Precedent, Court Sets Aside Reference Court Award and Determines Higher Market Value for Acquired Land in Village Shahpur.

29 Jan 2026

The case involves a first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the legal heirs of Patel Somabhai Khusaldas and others a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)