High Court of Karnataka Reviews Trial Court Order on Memo and Injunction Application in Pending Partition Suit. Plaintiff Challenges Order Allowing Bank's Memo and Rejecting Interim Relief Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
24 Aug 2023...
Search Results for "Plaint averments"
1990 result(s) found
Found 1990 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging City Civil Court Jurisdiction in Tenant Eviction Suit. Agreement for Sale and Power of Attorney Do Not Create Landlord-Tenant Relationship Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947, Section 28.
15 Dec 2005The present writ petition challenged an order dated 9.8.2005 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, on a preliminary issue of jurisdiction in L.C. Su...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Caste Validity Suit — Limitation Period Under Article 58 Not Applicable as Suit Sought Consequential Relief. Suit for Declaration and Setting Aside of Scrutiny Committee Order Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, and Filed Within Time.
8 Apr 2019The appellant, Gulab Ayubkhan Pathan, filed a suit (Special Civil Suit No.5 of 2017) before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, seekin...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trust Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Suit Relating to Public Trust Administration When Exclusive Remedy Lies Before Charity Commissioner Under Sections 80 and 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
4 Oct 2013The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking various reliefs against the trustees of Respondent No.3 Tru...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Allows Writ Petition, Setting Aside Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit. Plaintiff Entitled to Fixed Court Fee Under Section 35(2) as Joint Possession Presumed Unless Ouster Proved.
17 Jul 2026The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, by its single judge, entertained a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Frame Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction in Eviction Suit. City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Where Defendant Claims Ownership and Has Filed Separate Title Suit.
18 Dec 2017The case arises from a civil revision application filed by Vinod Shamsunder Aneja (the applicant/defendant) challenging an order of the City Civil Cou...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Upholds Appellant Bank in Debenture Trustee Suit, Holding Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred by RDB Act. Bank Acting as Debenture Trustee for Recovery of Debentureholders' Dues Is Not a 'Debt Due to Bank' Under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Suit Maintainable on Original Side.
7 Mar 2016The litigation arose from a suit filed in February 2002 by a banking company acting as a debenture trustee for recovery of Rs. 997 lacs together with ...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to grant specific performance of agreement to sell as plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform their part of contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
22 Oct 2019The dispute pertains to a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18-04-2005 concerning agricultural land bearing Khasara No.40, P...
- 191
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Bar Under Order 2 Rule 2(3) CPC — Plaintiff Omitted to Sue for Relief in Previous Suit on Same Cause of Action Without Leave. The court held that the cause of action in both suits was identical, arising from the same term-sheet agreement, and the plaintiff's failure to seek specific performance in the earlier suit without leave barred the subsequent suit.
19 Aug 2014The plaintiff, Govind B. Bajaj, filed Suit No. 186 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court seeking specific performance of a term-sheet agreement for joint d...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Return of Dispute to Civil Court in Co-operative Society Employee Termination Case — Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 91 MCS Act Does Not Preclude Return Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. The court held that the Co-operative Court lacked jurisdiction over service disputes but could return the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for presentation before the Civil Court.
6 Aug 2024The petitioner, Madhukar Mahadev Patil, was an employee of the Sangli Zilla Madhyawarti Sahakari Bank Ltd., a co-operative society. He was terminated ...
- 794
