Search Results for "valid marriage"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "valid marriage"

999 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 999 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Applicability of Section 292 IPC to Allegedly Obscene Poem Referencing Mahatma Gandhi Amidst Claims of Poetic License and Freedom of Expression. Court Clarifies That Poetic License Is Not a Legal License but a Fundamental Right, Subject to Reasonable Restrictions Under Article 19(2), and Obscenity Must Be Judged by Contemporary Community Standards.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose from the publication of a poem titled 'Gandhi Mala Bhetala' (I met Gandhi) in the July-August 1994 issue of the Bulletin, a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether DRT Mumbai Has Territorial Jurisdiction Under SARFAESI Act When Cause of Action Arises in Mumbai and Secured Property in Gujarat. Interpretation of Sections 17(7) SARFAESI Act and 19(1) RDDB Act and Applicability of CPC Section 16 to Securitization Applications.

15 Dec 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 8 October 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.

1 Jan 1970

The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Wife's Appeals in Cross-Border Child Custody Dispute — U.S. Courts Held to Have Closest Connection with Children. The Court upheld the High Court's order directing the wife to return to the U.S. with the children, finding that the children were not 'ordinarily residing' in India under Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, and that their welfare required joint parenting in the U.S.

12 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two special leave petitions arising from matrimonial disputes between Jasmeet Kaur (wife) and Navtej Singh (husband), both...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal in Favor of Dependents of Deceased Passenger Who Fell from Train Due to Jerk. Held that the death was an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the deceased was a bona fide passenger, entitling the appellants to compensation.

13 Jun 2023

The appellants, being the husband and sons of the deceased Shameem w/o Jugganbabu, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Upholds Award for Injured Mother and Daughter. Negligence of Driver Established; No Contributory Negligence Proven; Quantum of Compensation Based on Medical Evidence Upheld Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

7 Apr 2022

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident on 30 May 2014 involving a Tata Sumo vehicle (MH-04-BD-5592) on the Bombay National Highway. The claiman...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation and Evidence Appreciation. The court held that the First Appellate Court must discuss evidence and cannot ignore a finding on limitation that has attained finality.

9 Jul 2010

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between brothers. The appellants (Ulhas Shankar Barde and Urmila Ulhas Barde) and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Partition Suit Due to Remarriage Before Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Section 14 Benefit Not Available to Widow Who Remarried Prior to Act's Commencement

20 Oct 2011

The case involves a second appeal filed by the heirs of the original plaintiff, Sitabai Narhari Rakshe, against the dismissal of her suit for partitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)