Search Results for "section 376"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and MCOC Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove gang rape and organized crime.

The judgment pertains to appeals filed by convicts challenging their conviction for offences under Sections 392, 394, 366, 341, 354 and 376(2)(g) read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Rape and Murder Case. Judicial Confession and Last Seen Theory Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted as 'Rarest of Rare'.

The case involves the ghastly rape and murder of two children aged 10 and 7 years. On 29 October 2010, Mohanakrishnan picked up the children from outs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Mentally Ill Victim and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376 IPC set aside as sole testimony of schizophrenia patient was inconsistent and unsupported by medical or other evidence.

The appellant, Nandlal Zagadu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.77/2008 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and failure to explain incriminating circumstances upheld conviction, but mitigating factors led to commutation of death penalty.

The appellant, Vijay Raikwar, was convicted by the Trial Court for the rape and murder of a 7½-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 201 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction in Revision — Sentence Reduced to 4 Years R.I. Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix Under Section 376 IPC. Minor Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence Do Not Warrant Acquittal as Testimony of Victim is Found Reliable and Trustworthy.

The applicant, Tekaram s/o Krishna Ghormare, was convicted under Section 376 IPC by the 2nd Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhandara on 18.12.2003 in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...