Search Results for "muddemal"

902 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 902 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness and medical evidence contradicted his version.

The appellant, Sk. Mohin Sk. Munshi, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Sk. Rais Sk. Gani. The prosecuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Acquittal of Co-accused Maintained Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Case No. 9/2016. The appellant in Criminal Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 394 read with 34 IPC for killing a person over a petty sum of Rs. 50.

The case pertains to the murder of Bapu Rustum Salgar on 23 October 2004. The appellants, Sanjay and Anna Upadhe, were convicted by the Additional Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder by Burning in Brothers-in-Law Dispute. Dying declaration and medical evidence found credible to prove guilt under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Duryodhan Mahadeo Tantarpale and Gangadhar Vishwanath Tantarpale, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Ganesh Baban Solankar, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2006 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, recovery, and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Bodhuram Gurjar, was convicted by the first Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his uncle Sonbabu @ Sonpal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to the murder of Laik Khan.

The appellants, Arunkumar @ Kallu Rajendraprasad Pande, Ashok @ Guddu Rajendraprasad Pande, and Santosh @ Lallu Rajendraprasad Pande, were convicted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Jaiprakash Janbandhu, was convicted for the murder of his wife Yashodhara under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The...