Search Results for "import permit"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Public Interest Prevails Over Private Rights: : BIADA vs M/s Scope Sales Pvt Ltd (2026 INSC 89)

The case arose when the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) allotted land to M/s Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. for commercial use. Subsequentl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Intervention Order in Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Proceedings. Proposed Accused Have No Right of Hearing at Pre-Cognizance Stage Under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Mrs. Laxmi Mukul Gupta, filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Metropolitan Magi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

...