Search Results for "consumer protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "consumer protection"

777 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 777 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disinvestment of BPCL and Repeal of Burmah Shell Act — Strategic Disinvestment Policy Not Subject to Legislative Mandate for Prior Parliamentary Approval. The court held that the executive is competent to decide disinvestment under Article 73, and the repeal of the Burmah Shell Act by Finance Act 2016 is valid, with no right of first refusal for employees or dealers.

12 Nov 2020

The judgment concerns four petitions challenging the Union of India's decision to disinvest its shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving 'TANGO PUNCH' and 'TANGO CHARLIE' for Country Liquor. Use of Plaintiff's Embossed Bottles by Defendant Constitutes Infringement of Registered Composite Mark.

2 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., and the Defendant, Lokranjan Breweries Pvt. Ltd., both manufacture and sell country liquor. The...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. Appeal involves multiple interim applications and stakeholders including developers and financial institutions.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Government Employee — Holds That Time-Bound Promotion Granted Prior to Cut-Off Date Is Protected Under Government Resolution. The Court set aside the recovery of Rs.63,765/- and restored the appellant's pension as originally fixed, finding that the Government Resolution dated 8th February 1999 protected promotions granted before 31st December 1995.

21 Aug 2024

The appellant, Jagdish Prasad Singh, was appointed as Supply Inspector in the Government of Bihar in 1966. He received a time-bound promotion as Marke...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

22 Aug 2019

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds SEBI's Power to Regulate Fee Structure of Investment Advisors — Amendment Regulations and Circular Held Valid. Regulation 15A of SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 and Circular dated 23.09.2020 are within SEBI's delegated legislative competence and do not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

18 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Purnartha Investment Advisers Private Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Regulation 3(XII) of the Securities and Excha...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)