Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

931 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 931 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Award Debtors' Application to Stay Execution of Consent Interim Award in Arbitration Matter. Challenge to Interim Consent Award After 6 Years Held Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves chamber summonses taken out by the award debtors (Swarup Group of Industries & Anr.) seeking to stay the execution of an interim con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Status Quo in Arbitration Petition Over Restaurant Concession at Juhu Airport. Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement for Alleged Encroachment and Lack of Authority Leads to Appointment of Arbitrator and Conversion of Section 9 Petition to Section 17 Application.

The petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Survee Foods Private Limited against Airports Authority of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Order Recording Settlement in Arbitration Challenge. Parties Bound by Compromise Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 CPC; No Appeal Lies Against Consent Order.

The appellant, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd., f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sale-Cum-Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, MSRT Corporation, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...