Search Results for "blood group evidence"

1211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay s/o Nagu Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar in Sessions Case No. 25/2011 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Inconsistencies in Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry or harassment leading to death.

The appellant, Vikram Babasaheb Jadhav, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Ambejogai, for offences under Sections 302 and 498A o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder in Village Political Rivalry Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and motive.

The appellant, Chandansing s/o Dhannasing Patre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the offence punishable under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband and daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Kusum Sagun Malmanke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of her husband Sagun Tatoba Malmanke ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Ill 60-Year-Old Woman Under Section 376 IPC. Evidence of Incapacitated Victim and DNA Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajmat Shaha @ Ajju Tayyab Shaha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, District Akola, for the offence punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Not Established to Prove Guilt of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 03.05.2003 passed by the learned ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape and Sodomy Case under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 377, 506. Conviction Based on Sole Testimony of Child Victim Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony Under Section 157 Evidence Act; Minor Discrepancies in FIR Held Immaterial.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Ramesh Bansiram Pawar, by the Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No. 154 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.101 OF 2012

The appellant, Appa s/o Gajabapu Koradkar, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Ahmednagar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive, Recovery of Weapon, and Dog Tracking, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajaram Limbaji Babar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of two individuals, Subhadrabai and Nivr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Second DNA Test in Paternity Dispute. Court holds that repeated DNA testing is not permissible once paternity is established by a prior test, and that the Family Court's refusal to order a second test was justified.

The petitioner, Muni Anjanappa @ Thammaiah, married the first respondent, Smt. Roopa @ Gangalakshmi, on 24.05.2010. The petitioner claimed that the wi...