(SLP (C) No.28644 of 2019)
1 Jan 1970Background: The case involves a service dispute where an Executive Engineer (Civil) with the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was dismissed from serv...
Search Results for "arbitrary discretionary power"
776 result(s) found
Found 776 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.
13 Jan 2026The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.
17 Feb 2022The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...
- 1803
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.
22 Mar 2022The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution Sanction Against Former Lokayuktha in Corruption Case — Sanction Order Held Invalid for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Independent Consideration by Governor. The court held that the Governor's sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must reflect independent application of mind, and a mechanical endorsement of the investigating agency's proposal renders the sanction invalid, vitiating the entire prosecution.
22 Nov 2016The petitioner, Dr. Y. Bhaskar Rao, a former Karnataka State Lokayuktha, was arraigned as accused no.7 in Spl.CC 429/2015 for offences under the Preve...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.
10 Jul 2019The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the appellants, claiming ownership through inheritance, did not prove possession or title over the suit property, and the trial court's order refusing injunction was not perverse or arbitrary.
3 May 2019The appellants, Smt. Ratnem Vishnu Kamat and Mr. Vishnu Manjunath Kamat, filed an appeal against the order dated 21/09/2018 passed by the Senior Civil...
- 92
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Transfer Order of Undertrial Prisoner in Murder Case — Holds Magistrate Applied Blanket Transfer Without Assessing Individual Role. The Court Held That the Transfer of the Petitioner, Who Was Not Involved in Prison Misconduct, Violated Procedural Fairness and Set Aside the Impugned Order Under Sections 302, 201 IPC.
1 Oct 2024The writ petition challenged an order passed by the XXIV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru, directing the transfer of the petitioner, an...
- 63
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.
22 Jan 2024The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...
- 24
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Amendment to CPC Fixing 120-Day Limit for Written Statement; Challenge to Provisions Curtailing Judicial Discretion and Inherent Powers. The Amendment, Introduced by State Legislature, Allegedly Overrides Supreme Court Ruling and Violates Articles 14 and 141 of the Constitution.
28 Jul 2026The High Court of Karnataka entertained two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional validi...
- 52
