Search Results for "Public Auction Notice"

795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Public Auction Notice by HR&CE Department After Respondent Agrees to Withdraw and Reissue Notice. Court Records Withdrawal of Impugned Notice and Directs Fresh Notice Within 30 Days.

The petitioner, N. Balusamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Corrigendum in Public Works Contract — Arbitrary Modification of Eligibility Criteria Violates Article 14. Corrigendum altering experience requirement from 'similar work' to 'any work' held arbitrary and set aside.

The petitioner, Sri K.B. Kumar, a Grade I contractor, challenged a corrigendum dated 25.09.2024 issued by the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that mandatory sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the entire proceedings unsustainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Private Individuals in Corruption Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR Quashed as No Sanction Obtained for Prosecution of Public Servants, Making Proceedings Against Applicants for Conspiracy Not Maintainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors and Officers in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Requires Specific Averments of Role in Issuance of Cheque.

The petitioners, including M/s. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. and its directors/officers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read ...