Search Results for "Municipal Corporation Resolution"

1416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1 Set Aside. Market Value of Rs.6,417/sq.m. Awarded with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Corporator Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Failure to Produce Valid Caste Certificate Leads to Disqualification Under Section 16(1A).

The petitioner, Balchandra Shirsat, was elected as a corporator of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai from a constituency reserved for Schedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Impleadment of Liquidator in Pending Salary Recovery Suit -- Interprets IBC Provisions on Continuation of Proceedings Post-Liquidation -- Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Chamber Summons

The Petitioner, a former employee of Respondent No.1 company, had filed a Summary Suit in 2017 for recovery of salary dues -- After the company went i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Councillors for Defection Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1985. Petitioners who contested as independent candidates after being denied party tickets were held to have voluntarily given up party membership.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging identical orders dated 18.03.2015 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Unaided Private School to Fix Fees Subject to Reasonable Regulation. Fee Fixation Must Be Transparent and Not Excessive Under Grant in Aid Code and Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987.

The petitioners, Hindi Vidya Bhavan Society and another, are a society registered under the Societies' Registration Act, 1860 and a public trust under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that IOD does not confer immunity from action for illegal construction beyond sanctioned plans under MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellant, Parvez M. Yusuf, filed a suit challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai under Section 53(1) of the Mah...