Search Results for "Labour Inspector"

623 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 623 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Anees, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC for killing his wife after she refused to arrange Rs. 50,000 for his business.

The appellant, Ramesh Chagan Vithore, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Kalpana under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves four criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 278 of 2016, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness turned hostile and circumstantial evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Under MPDA Act — In-Camera Statements Verified by Authorized Officer Sufficient. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act upheld as statements of confidential witnesses were verified by Assistant Commissioner of Police and found genuine.

The petitioner, Rohit @ Karan s/o Purshottam Naukariya, was detained by an order dated 22/12/2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Doubtful Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for wife's murder set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kisanpal Rampal Paswan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of his wife, Rupa Paswan, under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Lacked Consistency and Corroboration.

The appellant, Satish Mahadeo Kale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Manisha, by setting her on fi...