KAHC020032022013_1
30 Apr 2014...
Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"
1014 result(s) found
Found 1014 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under UAPA for Conspiracy to Commit Terrorist Acts — Acquittal for Attempt to Commit Offences Under IPC and UAPA. Appellants convicted under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, but acquitted of attempt and other charges due to lack of evidence.
3 Dec 2018The case involves an appeal by Abdul Latif Abdul Rashid Shaikh @ Guddu and Riaz Ali Abubakar Shaikh @ Riyan against their conviction under Section 18 ...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Suit by Tamil Nadu Against Karnataka Over Pennaiyar River Water Dispute — Maintainability Barred Under Article 262 and Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956. Court Holds That Disputes Relating to Inter-State River Waters Are Exclusively Triable by a Tribunal Under the ISWD Act, 1956, and Not by the Supreme Court Under Article 131.
14 Nov 2019The State of Tamil Nadu filed Original Suit No. 1 of 2018 under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the State of Karnataka and the Union ...
- 473
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.
13 Jan 2023The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...
- 550
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Creates Estoppel Against Challenging the Scheme Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
9 Aug 2016The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Without Timely Challenge Estops Employee from Alleging Coercion Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
9 Aug 2016The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Tenant in Public Premises Act Case, Holding Pophale Protection Applies Despite Premises Belonging to Local Authority. Premises Owned by Port Trust, Though Exempt from Rent Control, Still Fall Within Supreme Court's Ruling That Pre-1971 Occupants Cannot Be Evicted Under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971.
3 May 2018The writ petition arose from an eviction proceeding under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The petitioner, Board of...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Review Petitions on Women's Entry to Sabarimala Temple to Larger Bench — Constitutional Questions on Religious Freedom and Essential Practices Require Authoritative Determination by Seven-Judge Bench. The court identified an apparent conflict between Shirur Mutt and Durgah Committee regarding judicial review of essential religious practices under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
14 Nov 2019The Supreme Court, in a judgment dated November 14, 2019, disposed of a batch of review petitions and connected matters arising from the earlier judgm...
- 368
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.
13 Nov 2006The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...
- 167
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.
22 May 2023The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...
- 31
