Search Results for "water tariff"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "water tariff"

109 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Electricity Supply Company Case — Plaint Rejected for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 145 of Electricity Act, 2003. Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Specific Performance of Contract for Electricity Connection Where Remedy Lies Before the Special Court Under the Electricity Act.

10 Dec 2020

The present case involves a civil revision petition filed by the Hubli Electricity Supply Company (HESCOM) and its Assistant Executive Engineer agains...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cess on Carbon Dioxide Transport Under Goa Rural Improvement And Welfare Cess Act, 2000 — Petitioner Not Entitled to Refund as Cess Act and Rules Upheld as Valid. The Court held that the earlier decision in Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Private Limited v. State of Goa & Others is binding, and the petitioner cannot seek refund of cess collected.

21 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Sicgil India Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the imposition of cess...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Exemption for HDPE Cloth as Man-Made Fabric in Sales Tax Reference. HDPE cloth manufactured from HDPE yarn using looms is exempt from sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as it falls within the description of 'cloth' in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1958.

5 Jun 2017

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at the insta...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)