Search Results for "vexatious suit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vexatious suit"

349 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint as Barred by Limitation and Without Cause of Action in Suit Challenging Sale Deed After Nine Years. The court held that a suit filed nine years after the execution of a sale deed is ex facie barred by limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

12 Jan 2026

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the applicant, Casme Industrial Park Devel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order — Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as Suit Barred by Limitation and Section 170 of Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that the suit seeking declaration of public documents as fraudulently obtained was barred by limitation and by Section 170 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and thus the plaint was liable to be rejected.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioners, original defendants, challenged an order of the District Judge-2 Panaji at Ponda dated 17.10.2023, which allowed an appeal by the res...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in CPC Application Rejection Case - Application under Order VII Rule XI of CPC for rejection of plaint was rightly dismissed as the appellants failed to establish grounds for rejection.

28 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a property partition involving land in Survey Nos. 700/A7B and 706/A9 of Nandyal Town, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The or...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Rejects Plaint for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Barred by Limitation. Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC applied to plaint seeking declaration of title and possession based on unregistered sale deed and unproven will.

23 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Sri P.R. Chenna Reddy, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action Against All Defendants Including Those Alleged to Be Benami. The court held that allegations of sham and benami transactions in a suit for specific performance constitute a cause of action and cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Jun 2021

The Appellants, original Plaintiffs, filed Suit No. 187 of 1993 seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st August 1985 in respect ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Partition Suit — Suit Properly Valued Under Section 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

20 Feb 2018

The petitioners, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in a partition suit (O.S. No. 53/2010) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a writ pe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to decree specific performance of agreement to sell, finding plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Mar 2015

The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, T. Narayana, filed a Regular First Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against the dismissal of his suit for specific performance...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Carrier for Short Delivery of Pharmaceutical Cargo Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. Carrier Held Liable for Missing Cartons Despite Claim of Limited Liability as Value Was Declared in Bill of Lading.

9 Sep 2005

The plaintiffs, M/s. Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 11,32,583/- with interest against the defendants, M/s. Stalc...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)