Search Results for "unauthorised possession"

793 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 793 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Writ Petition Under Article 226. Petitioner's claim of illiteracy and long residence does not excuse violation of planning laws; illegality cannot be cured.

The petitioner, Hanuman Jairam Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Encroachment on CIDCO Land by Minister's Relative. Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Glass House Construction in No Development Zone and Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, a resident of Navi Mumbai and Vice President of a multinational company, filed a Public Interest Litigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.

The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land in Public Interest Litigation. Administrative Tribunal's Order Regularising Unauthorised Construction by Minister Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Communidade Land Protection Laws.

The petitioner, an advocate and public spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal (resp...