Search Results for "turnover threshold"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Tender Dispute Concerning Garden Maintenance Contracts Under Judicial Review Principles. Court Evaluates Whether Rejection of Technical Bid and Allotment to Successful Bidders Was Arbitrary or Violative of Articles 14 and 19.

The dispute arose from a tender floated by the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation in August 2019 for maintenance and protection of gardens within ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...