Search Results for "theft"

969 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 969 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Theft Case Based on Compromise and Lack of Criminal Intent. The court held that where the complainant realizes the FIR was mistakenly registered and consents to quashing, the FIR can be quashed to secure the ends of justice.

The petitioner, Sarfaraz Tajammul Husain Ansari, an employee of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, sought quashing of FIR No. 336 of 2019 r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 411 IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge of Stolen Property. Conviction for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Under Section 411 IPC.

The applicant, Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal, was accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Absence of Theft and Common Object. Removal of Tin Sheets from Grampanchayat Property Does Not Constitute Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC as Essential Ingredients of Theft and Dishonest Intention Are Missing.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 12th October 2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.89 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Order in Electricity Theft Case. Payment of Compounding Fee and Admission of Guilt for Electricity Theft Estops the Owner from Subsequently Refusing to Pay Consumption Charges.

The High Court of Madras heard an intra-court writ appeal against an order of a single judge dismissing a writ petition concerning theft of electricit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Electricity Theft Case Against Owner — Mere Ownership Not Sufficient for Section 135 Liability. The court held that without specific evidence of direct involvement in tampering, the owner cannot be prosecuted under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The applicant, Navin Prakashsingh Thakur, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of F...