Search Results for "test identification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "test identification"

1240 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1240 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 452, 392, 397, 341 IPC and Section 27(1) Arms Act set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of weapons was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jun 2013

The appellants, Rakesh Gopal Shetty and Ramchandra Timyya Gauda, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

21 Aug 2015

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not linked to accused.

30 Nov 2006

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity. The p...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears State Appeal Against Acquittal of Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case. The appeal contested the trial court's finding that the identification of accused and recovery of stolen articles was not sufficiently proved under Sections 395, 396, 397, 402, 412, 414, 457 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

8 Jul 2014

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of eight accused who had been tried for dacoity, murder, and related offences in connec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits All Accused in Abduction and Culpable Homicide Case Due to Unreliable Sole Witness and Hostile Witnesses. The conviction under Sections 147, 148, 304 Part II/149, and 367/149 IPC was set aside as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, relying on a sole interested witness who turned hostile and without examining independent eyewitnesses named in the FIR.

18 Feb 2010

These criminal appeals arose out of the common judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Identification Process Was Flawed.

16 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Udayakumar (A-2) against his conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 394, 397, 307, 341 read with 120-B IPC and Arms Act set aside as sole reliance on interested witness testimony without independent corroboration found unsafe.

6 Feb 2023

The appellant, Mohd. Shoab Shaukatali Mansuri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 341, 394,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case. Appeal Raises Questions on Identification of Accused and Seizure of Cash Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Arms Act, 1959.

8 Dec 2006

This criminal appeal arose from Sessions Case No. 26/2003 where the appellant (original accused No. 4) was convicted for dacoity under sections 395, 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Illegal Sentence Below Minimum and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Section 397 IPC set aside as sentence of four years is below the mandatory minimum of seven years and identification by streetlight at 4:30 a.m. was doubtful.

23 Mar 2015

The applicant, Rahul Guruprasad Mishra, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.403 of 2013 for an offence punishab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Oct 2013

The case arises from three criminal appeals filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, in Sessions Case No. 19/201...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)