Search Results for "tendering evidence"

459 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 459 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.

The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Recall Document for Evidence in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Recall of Document from Collector's Office for Purpose of Tendering in Evidence

The petitioner, Shri Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a housing society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31-1-2012 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Order in Murder Case for Non-Compliance with Section 306 CrPC — Pardon Granted Without Examining Accused as Witness Violates Mandatory Procedure

The petitioner, Mahesh Balasaheb Thakoor, original accused no.3 in a murder case, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking ...