Search Results for "surplus land determination"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision, Rejects Plaint in Specific Performance Suit Involving New Tenure Land. Agreement to Sell New Tenure Land Without Collector's Permission is Void Under Section 43 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, and Suit Based on Such Agreement is Barred by Law.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Dilipbhai Parshottambhai Patel and others) against an order of the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Tenant's Challenge to Surplus Land Determination Under Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Act; Upholds Ceiling Notification Date and Rejects Post-Crucial Date Transactions as Inadmissible.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sale of New Tenure Land by Adivasi Requires Government Permission; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant, Shantaben Gopalbhai Tadvi, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order of Additional Commissioner Declaring Surplus Land. Additional Commissioner's Suo Motu Revision Quashed as Being Beyond Statutory Period of Three Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, legal representative of deceased Vinayak Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 11-08-1992 passed by the Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Land Ceiling Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 16 Years Held Unjustified as Original Order of Non-Surplus Holder Had Attained Finality.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Munjaji Shere, as legal representative of his deceased father Munjaji S/o Manaji, challenged a notice dated 13th July 1992 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...