Search Results for "summons trial procedure"

2159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to Lead Evidence.

The Civil Revision Petition arose out of a title suit (O.S. No. 466/2011) filed by one Smt. Akkayamma seeking declaration of title and permanent injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Recalls Ex Parte Decree Due to Non-Compliance with Service Rules. Service of Summons Not in Accordance with Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, Leading to Recall of Decree Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendants Nos. 2 to 4 under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to recall an ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment. Defendants Granted Unconditional Leave to Defend as They Had Disclosed a Defence in Earlier Affidavit.

The plaintiff filed a summary suit against the defendants for recovery of a loan. The defendants filed an affidavit in reply to an attachment before j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment on Defendants' Advocate. Service on Defendants directly without prior attempt on advocate held insufficient under Order XXXVII CPC.

The petitioners, original defendants in Summary Suit No.4914 of 2012, challenged the order dated 08.07.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Judgment-Debtor in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit Due to Lack of Service of Summons. Decree Set Aside as Appellant Was Not Served Summons and Had No Opportunity to Defend, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Shashikant s/o Eknath Choudhari, filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Ex Parte Substitution of Legal Representative. Order 22 Rule 3 CPC Does Not Permit Ex Parte Orders Without Notice to Opposite Party, Even if Application is Within Limitation.

The petitioners, Swapnesh Bhupati Mudliyar and another, were the original defendants in a suit filed by Smt. Tarabai @ Taramati Harishchandra Todankar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...