Search Results for "statutory inquiry"

3567 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3567 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee Under POSH Act in Cross-Departmental Complaint. Court Considers Whether ICC at Aggrieved Woman's Workplace Can Proceed Against Respondent Employed Elsewhere, Focusing on Statutory Definitions and Vishaka Guidelines.

The appeal arises out of a jurisdictional challenge by Dr. Sohail Malik, a 2010 batch Indian Revenue Service officer posted as OSD, Investigation, Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...