Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2019 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2019 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Landowners in MSRTC Bus Depot Acquisition Relying on Prior Award. Market Value Determined Based on Prior Award in Identical Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involved three land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the landowners claiming enhanced comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...