Search Results for "sole accused"

2523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and State's Appeal for Fine. Case Involves Issues of Identity, Motive, and Recovery Under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment of the Fast Track (Sessions) Judge-V, Bengaluru City, in S.C. No. 1199/2012, convicting the accused under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Accused in Part, Accepts State's Concession That Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Not Attracted. Conviction Under Sections 366A and 302 IPC Under Scrutiny, Based on Last Seen Theory and Circumstantial Evidence.

The Karnataka High Court heard a criminal appeal preferred by the accused against his conviction by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the appellants (accused No.1 and 2) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 10.12.2013 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 120-B IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.

The case involves three criminal appeals against a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, convicting the appellants for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Criminal Breach of Trust Case Due to Lack of Entrustment Proof. Alleged Misappropriation of Rs. 1,25,000/- by Cashier Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 408 IPC.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Raghunath Dhondu Vani, and the firm Bajoriya Oil Refinary, challenging the acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC Sections 120B and 302 Read with 34 Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies. Appeals Allowed Setting Aside Trial Court Conviction

The High Court of Karnataka allowed criminal appeals filed by five accused persons, acquitting them of charges under Section 120B of IPC for conspirac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused No.2 shared common intention with accused No.1 to commit murder.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.X, Bengaluru, in S.C.No.83/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302 rea...