Search Results for "seized gold"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "seized gold"

461 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft and House-Trespass — Presumption Under Section 114 Evidence Act Upheld Based on Recent Possession of Stolen Articles. The accused was convicted under Sections 380 and 457 IPC for night-time theft of gold ornaments and cash, and the courts below correctly invoked the presumption of recent possession under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

14 Jan 2019

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Imran Khan @ Banti Noorkha Pathan (the accused) against his conviction by the Judicial Magi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rescuing Accused and Causing Hurt to Customs Officers in Santhal Parganas. Sea Customs Act, 1878 Applicable to Scheduled Area Through Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947, and Inspectors Had Authority to Arrest and Seize Cloves as Prohibited Goods.

13 Nov 1969

The matter arose from an incident on 13 December 1961 at Pakur Railway Station in the Santhal Parganas, Bihar. Nazir Mian, one of the appellants, was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Commissioner Validly Invoked Section 263 for Non-Consideration of Seized Documents. The court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to consider seized 'Jama Kharch Panas' showing undisclosed turnover made the block assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.

26 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Assessee, M/s. Ranka Jewellers, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 set aside as live nexus between smuggling activity and detention order snapped by 10-month delay.

27 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Farida Imram Chamundi, wife of the detenu, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate Presence at Visible Distance During Customs Statement and Orders De-Sealing of Premises in Gold Smuggling Investigation. Petitioner's Right to Counsel Recognized as Harmless, and Continued Sealing Without Show Cause Notice Held Unjustified Under Sections 110 and 121 of Customs Act, 1962.

23 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Kalpesh Ghevarchand Jain, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking two reliefs: (1) recording of his statement under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

High Court Upholds Detention Order under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggled Goods Concealment Despite Argument of Classification Under Section 3(1)(i). Activities of Transporting Concealed Watches and Phones and Dealing in Smuggled Goods Held to Fall Under Sections 3(1)(iii) and 3(1)(iv) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974, Not Vitiated by Reference to Smuggling in Grounds.

13 Jun 2005

The case involved a writ petition filed by the wife of a detenu challenging a preventive detention order issued under section 3(1) of the Conservation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

24 Apr 2017

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Applicant in Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge or Reason to Believe Property Was Stolen. Conviction Under Section 411 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

18 Jul 2019

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shri Gotilal Dalchand Jain challenging his conviction under Section 411 of the Indian Penal...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)