Search Results for "section 304-A"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction of Driver in Rash Driving Death Case. Accused driver convicted under Sections 279 and 304A IPC for causing death of pedestrian due to rash and negligent driving; conviction under Section 134 r/w 187 MV Act also affirmed.

The revision petitioner, Kallappa S/o Bhimappa Sutagannavar, was the accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident on 17.05.2012 at about 2....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Death Caused by Negligent Driving of Mini Truck. Concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence cannot be interfered with in revision.

The applicant, Pradeep N. Shetgaonkar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) on 01/10/2012 for offences under Sections 279, 338,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Upheld as Prosecution Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Sudhir s/o Kalidas Deshmukh, a driver employed with the S.T. Depot, Soyegaon, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Soy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Death Case — Conviction Under Section 304A IPC Upheld. Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Medical Reports Establish Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Moulasab, challenging his conviction and sentence by the JMFC-I, Hubli in CC N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Surgery Against Medical Advice and Negligent Treatment Did Not Disclose Offence of Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder.

The petitioner, Dr. Seema Manohar Gunjal, a medical officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Causing Death by Negligence Case Under Section 304A IPC. Concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence of rash driving leading to death of a child not interfered with in revision.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Govind @ Dwarkadas s/o Nandkishor Loya against his conviction under Section 304A of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...