Search Results for "section 2(6A)"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was not barred by limitation as the plaintiff's possession was not adverse and the defendants failed to prove ouster.

The case pertains to a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Second Ejectment Suit as Barred by Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. Abatement of First Suit Exhausts Rent Controller's Permission and Prevents Fresh Suit Without Fresh Permission.

The case involves a dispute between landlords (appellants) and tenants (respondents) over a suit for ejectment and possession. The original landlord, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing daughter-in-law set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hirabai Dadarao @ Shrikant Patole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of her daughter-in-law Anita un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal: Capital Gains Excluded from Dividend Under Section 2(6A) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Assessee's Share of Dividend Derived from Capital Gains Held Not Taxable as Dividend Due to Express Exclusion in the Proviso to Explanation to Section 2(6A)(a).

The case involved assessment year 1949-50 where respondent shareholders received dividends from a company and claimed that the portion distributed out...