Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Filed by Employees of Survey Sections in Various Tahsildar Offices. Relief Sought and Final Decision Not Specified in Available Text.
26 Feb 2014...
Search Results for "section 13(8)"
2463 result(s) found
Found 2463 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Direction to Deposit 25% of Compensation Under Section 148 NI Act in Appeals Against Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Amendment to Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to appeals pending after its enforcement, regardless of when the complaint was filed.
21 Aug 2019The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by convicts under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenging the direction to deposit 25% of...
- 406
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Where Cheque Was Issued as Security Deposit. Held that a cheque given as security for due performance of a contract does not constitute a 'debt or other liability' under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and thus dishonour of such a cheque is not an offence.
20 Jul 2010The petitioner, Joseph Vilangadan, was the managing partner of M/s. Encon Engineering and Contractors, which entered into an agreement with the respon...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Case Due to Absence of Legally Recoverable Debt Allegation. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to aver existence of legally enforceable debt or liability.
6 Jul 2018The petitioner, R Parimala Bai, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.22...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Section 138 NI Act Jurisdiction Dispute — Complaint Maintainable at Place of Payee's Bank. Territorial jurisdiction for dishonour of cheque lies where the payee's bank is located, as presentation and dishonour occur there under Section 178(d) CrPC.
29 Aug 2011The case involves a criminal appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, concerning territorial jurisdiction. The appellant, Cro...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods
11 Dec 2025The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).
7 Jul 2022The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...
- 96
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 943
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Delayed Statutory Notice. Notice Issued 31 Days After Dishonour Exceeds 30-Day Limit Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Complaint Not Maintainable.
5 Mar 2015The petitioner, Smt. M. Shashikala, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of the proce...
- 36
