Search Results for "retrospective repeal"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Corruption Proceedings Based on Retrospective Application of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Amendment requiring prior sanction for investigation not applicable to cases where investigation commenced before its enactment.

The petitioner, T.N. Bettaswamaiah, was facing trial before the Special Judge, Tumakuru, in Special C.C. No. 152/2013 for offences punishable under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order Allowing Bank to Sell Secured Assets Despite Company Being in Liquidation. SARFAESI Act Proceedings Held Not Barred by Companies Act Winding Up Provisions; Secured Creditor's Right to Enforce Security Interest Prevails.

The petitioners, Capt. G.R. Gopinath and M/s Deccan Emerging Business Ventures Limited, challenged the order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the Debt Recov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Sick Leave by IDBI Bank. The court held that the reduction of sick leave from 540 to 360 days was a valid policy decision and not arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, All India IDBI SC,ST,Nav Buddhist and OBC Officers' Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...