Search Results for "retrospective regularisation"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking De-reservation of Lecturer Post and Regularization of Services. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to de-reservation or regularization under Government Resolution dated 5th December 1994.

The petitioner, Varsha Manohar Dhongade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Untrained Teacher's Admission to Postal D.Ed. Course — Violation of Natural Justice. Admission Cancellation Set Aside as Petitioner Was Not Granted Hearing Before Cancellation, and Course Completion Certificate Had Already Been Issued.

The petitioner, Anandrao Sakharam Rathod, was appointed as an untrained teacher on a clear post on 16 June 1996 at Indira Gandhi Primary School, Bhimw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order to Pay Full Salary During Suspension Period — Suspension Allowance Already Paid, No Entitlement to Full Salary Without Work.

The petitioners, Union of India and the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Varangaon, challenged the judgment and order dated 09.03.2005 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...