Search Results for "retrospective demand"

267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Doctor Denied Promotion in Indian Railway Medical Service Due to Inadequate Grading. Selection Committee's Assessment of Annual Confidential Reports Held to Be Objective and Not Vitiated by Bias or Arbitrariness.

The appellant, Dr. Indira Saranath, was a doctor in the Indian Railway Medical Service (IRMS). She sought promotion to the post of Chief Medical Direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice in GST Discount Case — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Limitation and Retrospective Effect of Circular Can Be Raised Before Adjudicating Authority Under Section 74 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Apollo Tyres Limited, challenged a show cause notice dated 2 August 2024 issued by the Additional Director, Directorate General of GST...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...