COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018
18 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "retention permission"
221 result(s) found
Found 221 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Resolves Difference on Quantum of Exemplary Costs in Hoarding Dispute — Imposes Rs.15,00,000 Costs for Suppression and Misstatement. Court holds that costs must be proportionate to conduct and commercial gains, balancing deterrence and proportionality under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Chapter XVII Rule 16 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
14 Nov 2024The petitioner, Pawan Advertising, installed hoardings after obtaining permission from the Grampanchayat, but without the required permission from the...
- 255
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
7 Aug 2024The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...
- 600
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.
22 Mar 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...
- 117
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.
10 Apr 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
17 Nov 2022The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.
22 Aug 2019The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Auction Sale Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act — Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Set Aside Sale After Confirmation and Payment. Court Held That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Title Passes, the Sale Cannot Be Set Aside Merely Because of Irregularities, and the Remedy of the Judgment Debtor Is to Claim Damages, Not to Annul the Sale.
6 Apr 2018The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by auction purchasers and judgment debtors challenging the auction sale of a sugar factory co...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Award Holder Against Award Debtor. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Non-Compliance, Incapacity, Natural Justice, and Public Policy.
15 Sep 2014The case concerns the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 17th January, 2011 passed in London, UK, in favor of Vitol S.A. (the award holder)...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.
20 Mar 2013The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...
- 52
