Search Results for "retail price revision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "retail price revision"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petitions in ESIC Prosecution for Non-Payment of Contributions — Limitation Period Under Section 468 CrPC Applies to ESI Act Offences. The court held that cognizance taken beyond the limitation period without an application under Section 473 CrPC is illegal, and quashed the complaints.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves five criminal revision applications filed by M/s. Sharp Eye Detective Services and its proprietor, Edward Fernandes, challenging the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.

2 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

1 Oct 2012

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

1 Jan 1970

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Watch Manufacturer Against Seizure Under Packaged Commodities Rules. Watches Sold in Boxes Are Not Pre-Packaged Commodities Under Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules 1977.

10 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Titan Industries Ltd., a manufacturer and seller of watches, challenged the seizure of its watches by the respondents (Union of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Waste Management Contract Dispute — Finds No Perversity in Tribunal's Interpretation of Price Escalation and Jurisdiction Over Merged Area. The Court held that the arbitral award was rational and plausible, rejecting challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 regarding Ghansoli Area coverage, price escalation cap, and interest rate.

18 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from a contract between Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) and Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd. for collection and transpo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit Under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. Assessee Claims That Requirement to Deposit 7.5% of Duty Demanded, Capped at Rs.10 Crores, Renders Appellate Remedy Illusory and Infringes Fundamental Rights to Trade and Livelihood.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, an importer of edible oils, challenged the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Food Adulteration Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused's Conviction for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil and Carrying on Business Without License Confirmed by Appellate and Revisional Courts.

28 Jun 2023

The case involves two criminal revision applications filed by Jairam Shadija, the accused, challenging the order dated 28.08.2015 passed by the learne...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Mar 2019

A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)