Search Results for "resolution plan"

1111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Maharashtra Act Moratorium Does Not Bar Insolvency Proceedings as Section 238 of the Code Overrides Inconsistent State Laws.

The appeal arose from the first application under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, a multi-product compan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Involving Trademark Ownership Dispute. The Court upheld NCLAT's finding that NCLT's declaration of trademark ownership impermissibly modified the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The appeal arose from a dispute over trademark ownership in the context of a corporate insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankrupt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Initiation of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Despite Payment by Guarantor's Resolution Applicant. Right of Subrogation Under Section 140 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Not Available Where Resolution Plan Extinguishes Guarantee and No Payment of Entire Debt.

The case involves an appeal against the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the 2nd respondent, Gujarat Hydrocarbon a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Insolvency Resolution Plan Implementation Dispute. The court upheld the NCLT order finding compliance with conditions precedent under the Resolution Plan, allowing implementation and extensions as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The batch of appeals arose from orders of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal concerning the implementation of a Resolution Plan under the Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Nagpur Improvement Trust Challenging High Court Order Setting Aside Demolition Notice. Internal Road Not Shown in Development Plan Under MRTP Act Cannot Be Implemented Despite Earlier Scheme Under NIT Act.

The case involves a dispute over a 15-metre internal road proposed under a Town Planning Scheme (the 'Abhyankar Road Widening and Buty Mahal Street Sc...