Search Results for "regular second appeal"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Property Title Dispute Due to Failure to Prove Ownership. The plaintiff's suit for possession was rejected as they could not establish title to the disputed land, with appellate courts re-evaluating evidence under civil procedure principles.

The dispute involved a registered Charitable Trust as appellant, claiming ownership of land in Khasra No. 4833, and respondents who were in possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Suit, Restores Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Suit for Declaration and Compensation Barred by Limitation Under Articles 58 and 72 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Cause of Action Arose in 1987 and Suit Filed in 2003.

The dispute involved a suit filed by the plaintiff against the State of Himachal Pradesh and others seeking declaration, mandatory injunction, and com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Decision in Property Title Dispute Due to Lack of Evidence on Power of Attorney. Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Restored as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Compliance with Registration Act for Foreign-Executed Document.

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the original plaintiffs seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession over a property, all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendants' Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholding Grant of Relief. Concurrent Findings on Validity of Agreement to Sell and Payment of Consideration Are Not Interfered With Under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, and Agreement Cannot Be Treated as Loan Document.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 11.02.2004, where Gurmeet Singh, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants, agreed to sell land to J...